I’ve taken some time over the last four weeks (I’m on paternity leave) to try to more deeply absorb and understand this list, and to try to come up with a simpler, clearer organizing structure to hang these biases off of.

There are duplicates a-plenty, and many similar biases with different names, scattered willy-nilly. Today, it groups 175 biases into vague categories ( decision-making biases, social biases, memory errors, etc) that don’t really feel mutually exclusive to me, and then lists them alphabetically within categories. The bias rating for Showbiz Cheat Sheet shows how conservative or liberal the media source is on political policies, their leanings on politicians, and overall article bias ratings. I think this has to do with how the page has organically evolved over the years. To distort other facts to facilitate love. I often scan it and feel like I’m not able to find the bias I’m looking for, and then quickly forget what I’ve learned. To favor people, products and actions merely associated with the object of his affection as seen in bias 10 influence from mere associ ation. Despite trying to absorb the information of this page many times over the years, very little of it seems to stick. However, honestly, the Wikipedia page is a bit of a tangled mess. I went ahead and started to build on top of the. Nothing else I’ve come across seems to be both as comprehensive and as succinct. Cognitive bias cheat sheet which resulted in the above graphical representation by JOHN MANOOGIAN III. It’s been an invaluable reference for helping me identify the hidden flaws in my own thinking. I’ve spent many years referencing Wikipedia’s list of cognitive biases whenever I have a hunch that a certain type of thinking is an official bias but I can’t recall the name or details.

The cheat sheet bias